Why I loved AutoCon 5
While every AutoCon has been important and unique, AC5 was significantly different for me in the best possible way. Let me give you my personal take…
Rock Stars, Frameworks, and the Hallway Track: AutoCon 5 in München
In June, more than 650 network automation practitioners packed into Munich for AutoCon 5, joined by another 250+ who came a couple days early for hands-on workshops. Then, like we do after every AutoCon, we asked you to tell us how it went; the good, the annoying, and everything in between…
2026 NAF Advisory Board Updates
NAF is seeking applications for the next class of its Advisory Board (AB). We are looking for committed individuals to fill six AB positions who can bring fresh insights and active participation to help guide AutoCon content and the future of NAF.
You're Not Alone: Business Cases, AI, and Real Conversations
AutoCon 4 descended on Austin, Texas the week before Thanksgiving, and based on the post-event survey results, the community showed up in force and left energized. Over 700 people attended the main conference and 250+ participated in the pre-event workshops. We asked everyone to tell us what they thought, and you delivered.
SONiC Reality Check: Enterprise Deployments Beyond the Hype
SONiC represents a legitimate alternative for specific use cases and organizations, but it's not the universal solution some marketing suggests. The technology works—Microsoft Azure and other hyperscalers prove that at scale. However, the operational model and skill requirements represent a fundamental shift from traditional networking approaches.
From Scripts to Services: API Gateways for Network Automation
API gateways for network automation aren't revolutionary. They're sensible abstraction that addresses real operational challenges. The key is balancing architectural flexibility with implementation pragmatism. Start simple, solve real problems, and evolve based on actual usage patterns rather than theoretical requirements.
Terraform for Networks: Where It Works, Where It Breaks, and How to Decide
A key insight from this discussion is that many teams end up adapting tools originally designed for cloud and server management to networking contexts. While purpose-built network automation tools do exist, organizations often gravitate toward tools that align with their broader infrastructure practices and skillsets. The key is matching the tool to the specific requirements, constraints, and organizational context of each use case.
The Network Engineer's Guide to Python Tooling
The "best" Python workflow isn't about using the newest tools—it's about reducing friction for your team while maintaining reliability. Many successful network automation teams use hybrid approaches: modern dependency management under the hood with simple, consistent interfaces on top.
Git vs. Source of Truth: Real-World Network Automation Data Management
The choice between Git and source of truth platforms isn't binary. The best approach often combines elements of both, leveraging structured data management while maintaining the change control and versioning that make network automation reliable.
Design-First, Trust-Always: Summarizing what we learned at AutoCon3
AutoCon 3 demonstrated that network automation has evolved from experimental scripts to business-critical infrastructure. But perhaps the conference's most important insight came from recognizing that automation success depends as much on psychology, trust, and user experience as it does on technical correctness.
Fine-Tuning LLMs for Network Configuration Intelligence
Rather than wholesale AI adoption or rejection, Baumann advocated for thoughtful application: understand the technology, identify appropriate use cases, implement with realistic expectations, and validate results.